Feb 06

Coe Dowdy Report 2/3/07

ROMP is planning ahead for a Coe Epic Weekend in the Dowdy Ranch area on May 11-13. This will be a free event for ROMP members only in cooperation with MTBR May By the Bay. Following is a report of the ongoing trail work and scouting in preparation for the event.

The fabulous weather of the weekend encouraged our trip to the Dowdy area on Saturday. Richard tracked our progress with his GPS, and to satisfy your curiousity, if any, here is a link to the track:
http://trail.motionbased.com/trail/episode/view.do?episodePk.pkValue=2037156
You can see a generalized track of where we went. We parked at Pacheco Creek Crossing and rode up the Kaiser-Aetna road, Center Flats, and Burra Burra to get to Dowdy. This way we got a little ride in, and got a good look at Burra Burra on the way. They all look really good. No impeding deadfalls or erosion issues. At this time of the year the tread is obvious, but that will change when the grass grows up.

Then we went down to Dowdy by the back way next to the water tank. This is fine too. Since this will probably be frequented by staff vehicles, I suppose it will be maintained through vehicle use.

We were impressed again by the grand facilities down there.

Then we got to work, if you can call it that. We each had a roll of orange flagging tape. Plus, I had a quiver of orange wire flags in my pack. We marked the way with these.

Sorry for the long email, but descriptions take a while.

Start of Macks Trail

At Dowdy there is a prominent partially dead large oak at the brink of the hill. There used to be a water spigot here, and that is where I always used to start down. I suppose this tree will eventually die and fall down within a couple of decades. In any case starting a trail under its canopy and over its roots is a bad idea. Also the hill is steep below.

It looks as though it has been determined. The egress from the equestrian parking area, and the tractor trail up from the septic field intersect to suggest a natural place to start Macks trail from the picnic area. I figure it would not be good to have the trail come up to the picnic tables directly.

It would serve well to have another spur to the start of Macks that stems off Kaiser-Aetna Rd (KA) a couple of hundred yards or so downhill from the gate, so that through trail users don’t have to bother with the picnic area. There used to be a trail there, but we did not investigate. The construction destroyed most of it for sure. A new route would be simple to route along the periphery of the field along the woodlands edge.

Even with winter baring the hill, Macks trail is extremely vague up at the top.

For the purpose of example and suggestion only, I layed a pin flag line, starting from the place mentioned above. We used a clinometer and kept the grade below 16%, tracing a track that would make establishing a trail very easy, with no excavation of soil, or the creation of cribbed switchbacks. The switchbacks would be broad climbing turns. The hill is so steep, that a strict 10-12% grade isn’t practical confined to the established corridor.

I forgot to shoot the grade of the existing Macks trail, but it must be around 25%. If the original Macks Corral Trail alignment is retained, a good amount of use is going to create some bad erosion here. It is a fall line trail. The only thing keeping it nice, is the lack of use. I actually do not think that the Dowdy will be very popular for visitorship. So this issue may not be all that urgent. But what do I know.

About a 1/4 mile down the trail crosses a fence line at an old gate location, marked by thick timber. The trail alignment exercise ends here. Above this the switchbacking flags can be seen, placed rather sparsely apart. The barren hill gives up the real location of the Macks Corral Trail readily when you look at it, and it just goes straight up. Just before the gate there is a drainage area and crossing which would be a soggy to quagmire problem area in the trail during wet periods, for above is a significant acreage of catchment that drains here. A trail would need to address this with some design. Not a big problem, but a real one. If you look at the sattelite image zoomed in, you can see the gulch clearly.

On a side note, the flags are merely a suggestion of what could be a relatively pleasant trail to hike with or without a pack, amble on a horse, and ascend on a bicycle. I think it can work, I know it can. Visitors will not like the original Macks Trail. I can hear the cursing already! Details are lacking.

Below the gate, we simply and frequently flagged the existing route. In an 1/8 of a mile the track turns left as you go down on a decent alignment that contours/angling down over another drainage (maybe a contiuance of the gulch crossed above). Nice here.

Between this contouring section and the gate above, you’ve got some steep road. There’s room to wangle some turns to take many degrees of the trail. If staff wants to develop a real trail, like the one I flagged, everything above this left turn would be a good application of attention. The rest of the trail below this with a few exceptions, is much more acceptable as is.

Continuing below you go under the canopy of the woodland over rocky tread and cross a couple of drainages, which will be running with water during a wet year. The shallow bedrock keeps water on the surface and erosion is not a problem. Angling down the second larger drainage here, we flagged a line left of the original road bed, favoring a very prominent deer trail that is 5 degrees less steep than the overgrown and impassable road.

Cross the streambed and a short steep climb out (well done trail design here although brutal steep) takes one to a wide flat area of oak and grass woodland. The road peters out a bit and then is picked up to the left, not dead ahead, and continues down. It would be good to shoot the grade here, but we didn’t. On trail work day, whenever that comes, we’ll check this. This part is steep, but is pretty damn decent by Coe standards, and so is good to keep as is . This is a very pretty part too. It’s pretty much a straight shot down the hill for the next mile. The trail can be invisible, and we’ve marked it generously.

Eventually you come to a left turn and enter a rocky tunnel through poison oak. This is a major site for our trail work. It is straightforward in winter to mitigate the poison oak by hacking the vines at the base, and digging up some of the roots. This is something I am willing to do, and take precautions doing. The trees here would appreciate it. Some of our volunteers brushed this area for a season’s passage in 2002 (IMBA Epic). Now it is tricky to get through.

The trail becomes too steep again. The originators of the trail seem to have picked an angle that was as straight as possible without hitting any trees. It’s catty-wompass off camber if you know what I mean. This part would be great to realign. There are some areas where the road bed shows significant erosion damage. We are down close to Pacheco Creek here, and silt contribution from the trail might be an issue. It cross a rocky gully, which collects silt from the trail, and then finally you reach the barbed wire enclosure which I figure must be the namesake and the end of Macks Corral Trail.

North Fork Trail

From Macks Corral the trail crosses a pasture. I pin flagged the tread. There’s a nice view to the hillside. Spring time wildflowers can be spectacular here. I’ve seen large spreads of owls clover here. At the other end there is a pile of rock with poison oak growing in it. Then there is the first creek ford.

I did mention it is a bit of shame to cross the creek so much, but it is the only practical route available, and I am fine with it the way it is.

On the other side a worn in track climbs over to what turns out to be the top of a steep rock. For mountain bikers this is the cat’s meow. We like riding this stuff. You come down onto rocky sand and head along the side upstream for maybe 40 yards, and then the trail corsses the creek again. After some uneven ground and a gulch crossed above a newly fallen pine, the track crosses a small meadow, and then becomes a side hill single-track, climbs up and along the west creekside.

The section described in the previous paragraph has some fun things for volunteers to work on. The short climb up to the top of the rock could be widened a bit. Some brushing and tread clearing will make the passage better for all users. Overhead clearance for equestrians is an issue to address as well. Some ramping in and out of the creek crossings would help. Most anything done under the flood line is obviously temporary. The part where the trail sidehills above the creek on the west side is a great piece of trail that was probably a cow track originally. It can be widened a bit and brushed.

Next the trail goes down to creek level again into an area of small boulders. Tricky to walk across, and impossible for all except trials riders to ride a bike across. Here is where I’ve crossed the creek and rode on gravel bars in the past, but things change, plus that is not as good practice anymore. We can keep everyone on the west side for a piece, even through the rocks, as it is a brief passage. Some rearrangement of the rocks could make this part better and more enjoyable.

Then you come to another obligatory creek crossing, which is not too bad, but rocky. On the other east side there is a fallen tree which is in the way for equestrians and will eventually fall an block the track, that ought to be removed. You can hike or ride under it no problem.

Then the trail contours up to a low ridge spur to circumvent a large rock outcrop above the creek. We flagged the tread on the uphill side, because this is the better one. Recent horse trips have favored the left and lower tread by accident, and have trampled in a lower parallel track, that climbs much steeper, and ruins a nice pocket meadow. A bit of cutter-mattock and mcleod work along this section would be nice. It forms a good ramp up to a knoll.

The trail goes down the other side and adopts a rocky gulch for 12 feet and comes out to a nice meadow for camping by a good swim hole. Then the Tie Dwon trail junction appears. N Fork tail continues and stays on the east side of the creek until PCC. This part is nice to hike and ride. Some parts need contouring, drainage, & benching, and lite brushing.

The final creek ford across the the PCC area of Kaiser Aetna is too hectic for most cyclists, but no problem for everyone else. A narrow slot between boulders forms a natural and pleasing end to the N Fork trail before crossing the creek over to the west, and serves good notice to riders that they might want to get off and walk soon. It is rideable, and these rocks would soon bear scrapes from bike metal.

There’s a multiplicity of social trails trampled around this area of the popular PCC. It would be good to define one practical route.

Summary:

The Macks Corral and N Fork Trails would become a primary attraction to visitors to the Dowdy Ranch trailhead. A lot can simply be done to improve Macks Corral.

If/when the Scherrer trail gets a good treatment, then an excellent large loop could be created with Macks and N Fork trails.

The N Fork trail is good as it currently exists. Since it follows a placid creek, it is not vertically challenged. Continous rearrangement of low lying sections by seasonal floods will be ongoing.

Macks Corral trail needs some sort of attention. A placement of the trailmarker is needed, and then an erosion resistant route down to the trail needs construction. This is the minimum. A practical alignment has been suggested. If staff indicates that this is desirable, it is possible to make this happen quickly. All it would take to establish the trail is to have users use it.

Below the first left turn, Macks Corral could be left as is, except that the last half mile contains sections that should be modified in coming years.

Dowdy Volunteer Days

Groups split into two. One group heads down Macks, and the other starts at PCC and works on the N Fork trail. The Macks crew will ride bikes downhill with tools in a bike trailer, and that will save on travel time. N Fork is much shorter, and can easily be covered on foot.

It looks like next weekend will be rained out. I feel that this work is really needed, and will keep trying for this on as many weekends as I have free, even if it means bringing only small numbers of volunteers. Persistence will eventually prevail in some worthy improvements.

Feb 06

The Woodside Safe Cycling Challenge

by Millo Fenzi, a Concerned Woodside Cyclist

Become a safe cycling advocate. Convert two friends to be safe cycling advocates.

Why the Challenge?
Numerous cyclists enjoy the bucolic roads in the Town of Woodside. Unfortunately some residents of Woodside are at a boiling over with anti-bike sentiment. This noisy minority shows up at Town meetings, sign petitions, takes photos of poorly behaving cyclists and in general does a great PR job of vilifying cyclists. The angry rhetoric polarizes the participants and spawns ever escalating acts of road rage. This rage creates very real safety risks for cyclists� on roads in Woodside. The goal of the Safe Cycling Challenge is to defuse the rage by improving cyclists� behavior. Drive down the rage and you improve the safety of the Woodside cycling experience. Who makes up the �noisy minority�?
About 5000 residents are in Woodside. The vast majority of the residents are not actively anti-bike. A vocal handful is virulently anti-bike. They are:

1. Equestrian trail riders who have been frightened and endangered by poorly behaved mountain bikers illegally using the horse trails. Their anger extends to all cyclists, road and mountain alike.
2. Old La Honda Road residents who, as they drive up and down to their homes many times a day, have been frightened and endangered by poorly behaved cyclists.
3. Users of public roads in Woodside who have been frightened and endangered by poorly behaved cyclists. Often the cyclists are participating in one of the many high-speed pack rides that route through town. This group includes motorists, cyclists, equestrians, pedestrians, dog-walkers, etc.

The virulently anti-bike group acts as a catalyst and galvanizes an additional few hundred people who have been frightened or endangered by badly behaved cyclists.

Does the �noisy minority� have a valid case?
Yes and no. Yes in that mountain bikes are not allowed on Woodside�s horse trails. Yes in that poorly behaving cyclists riding up Old La Honda ride two or three abreast and make little effort to help cars get by them. Yes in that some of the high-speed pack riders slow down for nothing and can be harsh to an obstacle � be it on two or four wheels or feet. No in that not every mountain bike rider illegally on the trails is a 30 mph tattooed downhill zombie. No in that most cyclists riding up Old La Honda are responsible, stay to the right where safe and wave cars on. No in that not every rider in every pack ride is looking to paint a road kill symbol on his or her top tube.

So yes, each complaint is based on the actions of at least one poorly behaving cyclist. And no, this behavior does not describe the vast majority of cyclists riding through Woodside.

Before you dismiss this noisy minority try on their clothes. Drive your car all the way up and back down Old La Honda Road starting at about 9:00 AM on a summer Saturday. The next Saturday take your dog or baby for a walk on Tripp Road. Begin at Kings Mountain Road; stay on the left side of the road – facing traffic like a good pedestrian – and start walking around 9:40 AM. One of the bigger and higher-speed packs should appear soon. This should give you a baseline appreciation of just how scary dangerous a badly behaved cyclist can be.
What about poorly behaved motorists?
Poorly behaved motorists are more plentiful, more deadly, and pose a far greater risk to life and limb than cyclists. Two differences. First, no noisy minority in Woodside is vilifying motorists. Second, our suggested solution for poorly behaved motorists is a Rules of the Road handout. The handout is under construction.

What do Safe Cycling Advocates do?
Safe Cycling Advocates (�SCA�) are:

1. Courteous, say �Hello�, waves cars on when safe, hold them back when it�s unsafe and show common courtesy to everybody � motorists, equestrians, pedestrians, cyclists, etc � they meet on the road. SCAs follow the rules of the road.
2. Vocal advocate for safe cycling. Explain the urgency and ask riders to do the above at the start of a ride, in Club meetings, at pizza fests after rides, etc.
3. Take proactive ownership for the entire group you ride with. For example. 41 riders are spinning down Canada Road at 27 MPH. 40 of them are in orderly pairs and using the wide shoulder. The 41st rider is in the middle of the lane. A car, doing the street legal 35 MPH, comes up behind the pack but can�t pass because the one rider is blocking the lane. The rider makes no effort to get as far right as practicable. SCAs speak up and ask the rider to let the car pass. Afterwards they ride up alongside the rider and explain that delicate nature of bike/car interactions in Woodside and ask them to be more courteous.
4. Riders of legal trails only. A few poachers make it bad for everyone. Ask your friends to obey the rules of the trail.

You are cycling�s ambassador!
The vast majority of Woodside residents do not hate bikes. Treat them as if they do and you create a self-fulfilling prophecy! Again, 95% of Woodside residents don’t hate bikes. Many of them have had at least one encounter with a badly behaved cyclist. The encounter you are having with them molds their image of cyclists. You are cycling�s ambassador! So follow the Safe Cycling Advocate behaviors and make a good impression.

Your actions won�t win over the virulent anti-bike people. They will, over time, drastically reduce the number of Woodside residents who support them.

Feb 06

Open Space Authority seeking new Board member

The Santa Clara County Open Space Authority has a vacancy on its Board of Directors. The Board must appoint an individual to fill the vacant position on the Board of Directors representing District 7 which includes parts of Edenvale and the Evergreen areas of San Jose and other unincorporated area. Individuals interested in being considered for this appointment must be at least 18 years of age, live within the boundaries of District 7 and be a registered voter. The applicant must also submit a letter of interest to the Authority no later than 5:00 p.m., Tuesday February 20, 2007.

Letters should be sent to:

District 7 Vacancy
Santa Clara County Open Space Authority
6830 Via Del Oro, Ste 200
San Jose , CA 95119
Fax: (408) 224-7548To be considered, the letter should address the following issues:

Explain your interest in serving on this Board. Your vision for the Open Space Authority, including types of activities on its lands.
Community activities and work experience. Major issues you see affecting the Open Space Authority in the near future. Include any additional information you feel relevant. For more information, contact the Open space Authority at (408) 224-7476 or info@openspaceauthority.org .

A map showing the boundaries of District 7 can be found here:


http://openspaceauthority.org/index.html

Feb 06

Sanborn Draft Master Plan meeting Feb 7, 6:30pm

The Draft Sanborn Trails Master Plan and the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration will be presented to the Parks & Recreation Commission (PRC) on Wednesday February 7th. The PRC meeting starts at 6:30pm at the Isaac Newton Senter Auditorium at the County office building at 70 W. Hedding St. in San Jose.

Dec 18

Get Involved!

There has been a lengthy discussion on the email list about how we can improve ROMP and get more people involved in making ROMP fun, social and an effective advocacy organization.

To here all the gossip and the latest breaking news about ROMP, sign up to our email list on the left of this page. You can choose individual emails or a daily digest.I said I would summarize the suggestions that people have made that I support. I would like to reiterate that I cannot do all this myself, and am actively looking for somebody to head any or all of these activities up. While advice and suggestions are welcome, they will remain just advice and suggestions unless somebody steps up and takes action.

1) Ask your friends to Join.
2) Print business cards to give out to non-members to remind them to join
3) Allow payment for memberships on paypal
4) Make a “real” marketing campaign with metrics and feedback on efficacy
5) Make people feel they are welcome
6) More social programs. (Maybe heavily discounted for members)
7) Try to bring in younger members
8) ROMP Trips for Kids Chapter
9) Skills classes
10) Singles Rides
11) New Riders / New Members for Free on Craigslist. I support listing stuff on Craigslist, but I am not sure about Free Memberships through Craigslist
12) “New Riders” easy ride
13) ROMP water bottles with Marketing insert
14) No begging, pleading nor guilt
15) Co-List Rides with other organizations, other outlets (e.g. Mere-Mortals, Nocal High School league)
16) Make a business plan / Overall marketing Strategy / Marketing tactics. Answer questions such as “Why Grow? How to execute the Plan? Who to target? How to fund it?” Maybe form a committee to formulate the plan.
17) Writing a couple of newsletter articles
18) Update our brochure
19) Get some social events on next years calendar
– Coe Epic
– Carrot Fests, one for each county
– Picnic
– Weekend Trips (Tahoe, Fort Ord, Henry Coe)

Let me know what you would like to help out with.

Josh Moore
President@romp.org

Dec 17

Sierra Azul Bear Creek Redwoods OSP Input Needed

In case you missed the opportunity to provide some input at the Sierra Azul / Bear Creek Redwoods Master plan Meeting earlier this month, you can send in an email with your comments.

Please provide your feedback to
Ana Ruiz, Project Planner
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
330 Distel Circle
Los Altos, CA 94022
Email: masterplan@openspace.org

Things to Say:
– Open Bear Creek Redwoods to Bikes!
– Support Option C
– More contour line trails like the Priest Rock to Kennedy option
– Open a bike corridor through Rancho de Guadalupe
– Permit back country camping
– Plan a trails network based on desired routes and modern design techniques rather than on existing trails. Implement it over time.
– Support regional trail connectors such as Limekiln to St. JoesephsThe District proposed three basic ideas to choose from, and said that these ideas could also be selected amongst in a smorgusboard type fashion. The first option, A, is to do nothing – status quo. The second and third options involved increasing public access, and removing legacy buildings to various degrees.

Both B and C options call for leaving Bear Creek Redwoods closed to bikes. While this will be unpopular to the residents of Summit Road who would like bike commute options, their rationale for this was reasonable. They said that this preserve already has a stable on it and a history of equestrian use, and also does not interconnect to neighboring preserves, which is largely correct.

The Basic difference in plans B and C are the amount of parking spaces in the parking lots, number of camp sites, and miles of trail open to the public. Generally speaking, I support option C, with a few caveats.

The “planning” of trails largely involved deciding which existing fire roads to open to the public and which ones to restore to a natural state by slashing and replanting vegetation. I think this is a really shortsighted way to plan, although one could argue that it maintains the historical nature of the preserve. As this is a plan, I would strongly encourage the district to plan some more contour line trails, and shorter loops near trail heads.

Both options would open the vast majority of trails in Sierra Azul, leaving the Rancho de Guadalupe area closed to cyclists. The rationale for that is its proximity to an “urban” center, that it will probably be used by families and proximity to a stable. With Plan C, a trail would be open from Rancho de Guadalupe up to the alignment of the Bay Area Ridge Trail. Since this would be a regional trail connector, I would hope they would open at least a bike corridor through this area, which could someday provide a good loop in conjunction with Almaden Quicksilver.

Other areas that may prove contentious in the mountain bike community are the re-alignments of Rattlesnake and Dogmeat (Upper Priest Rock) Trails. The re-alignments are deemed necessary due to erosion and water quality issues.

Of interest in the plan was a few campsites. One would be 2.5 miles up Kennedy, and another just 3/4 miles up rattlesnake near SDF. The policy is to provide camp sites with bathrooms and water, so remote campsites seem to be out of the question. I did not ask if back country camping will be possible. I think not.

Plan B calls for the removal of all buildings in BCR except the Chapel (and stables) which would be restored. In Sierra Azul, it calls for the removal of all buildings except the Monolith. Plan C calls for the removal of all buildings except the stables.

More Information

Dec 17

MTB-101 Returns!

ROMP Intermediate Beginner�s Ride

Title: Mountain Biking 101

Units: 0
Hours: 4-6 per month.
Location: Fremont Older Open Space
22694 Prospect Rd. Saratoga, CA 95070, Parking Lot, Gate FO-01.
Time: Meet at 10:00 am.
Days: 4th Sunday of each month.
Ride Leader: Rich Andrews 408.393.1959 randrews@arc.nasa.gov
Open Enrollment: All ages� welcome.
Materials fee: $0.

Prerequisites:
Successful completion of Jim Sullivan�s �4th Saturday Beginner�s Clinic� or equivalent.

Required Reading:
�Beginner�s MTB Information Guide�

MTB 101�s Goal:
Practice the basic biking techniques required to sustain climbs and descend single-track safely.

Basic Route:
From the Prospect Rd. parking lot, be prepared to practice climbing 300 feet in 1 mile to Hunter�s Point via fire road. No time limit, no rider left behind. Descend the Seven Springs single-track loop trail.

Extra Credit Routes:
Seven + additional miles of trails within the park are available.

Post Ride:
Recovery ceremony at local establishments!

Older posts «

» Newer posts